rear shock angles

More
11 May 2011 00:01 #450216 by boyracer
rear shock angles was created by boyracer
whats the deal with laying the shocks over?
seen this a few times, mostly on SANCTUARY bikes and older MORIWAKI superbikes.
The moriwaki bikes ran a REALLY LONG shock body that mounts UNDER the swingarm through a hole.
One of the sanctuary bikes (RCM-047) has a lot of work put into the shock mount area with triangulation,etc. Japs love their twin shocks.
I understand the longer shock bit.... better ability to transfer heat, better damping control,etc. but what is the significance of the extra included angle?

On my build the MACINTOSH swinger (from New Zealand) has 3 options for lower shock mount. I can't remember any real difference in use..was 20 years ago though.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 May 2011 16:30 #450328 by dutchz
Replied by dutchz on topic rear shock angles
We had a fairly lengthy discussion about this on a different forum (Mark may chime in). Laying the shock down by moving the top mounts forward allows increased wheel travel (for the same length shock) and makes shock compression more progressive so you can run a stiffer shock while retaining a softer initial feel. Moving the lower shock mount back would have the opposite effect and is more of a drag race modification.

1974 Kawasaki Z1
Stock front hub and rear axle.
The following user(s) said Thank You: boyracer

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 May 2011 16:40 #450330 by 531blackbanshee
Replied by 531blackbanshee on topic rear shock angles



they use this jig to make sure they are in the right place.




beyond that i am of no help. :whistle:

leon

skiatook,oklahoma 1980 z1r,1978 kz 1000 z1r x 3,
1976 kz 900 x 3
i make what i can,and save the rest!

billybiltit.blogspot.com/

www.kzrider.com/forum/5-chassis/325862-triple-tree-custom-work

kzrider.com/forum/5-chassis/294594-frame-bracing?limitstart=0
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • hocbj23
  • Visitor
11 May 2011 16:53 #450332 by hocbj23
Replied by hocbj23 on topic rear shock angles
As an example, on my KZ1000, I run a GS1100e swingarm that sets the lower mounts back about 1.5 inches.I use the stock upper mount. Hagon built me a set of HD shocks with GS lowere mounts and KZ uppers. As I occasionally run the bike at the strip, I was more concerned with rear wheel hop and chassis rigidity than I was ride.The bike rides a bit stiff,but hooks up great at the strip and corners well on the twisties.The stock KZ shock mounts are almost perpendicular while mine are about 75 degrees.The bike has about a 2 inch lower seat height as well.Rear wheel travel is more than adequate,even with 2 up.Hope this helps.bj

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 May 2011 19:33 - 11 May 2011 19:33 #450354 by dutchz
Replied by dutchz on topic rear shock angles
Thanks for the pics Leon, I am gearing up to do mine as soon as I have my box swingarm finished. I was going to make an alignment jig too but that thing is a monster, jeez... :laugh: I'm going to make a simple small jig that slips over the stock mounts with a drill guide for the new mounts.

What bj says confirms what I wrote previously, moving the lower mount rearwards makes a stock (soft) shock feel firmer and decreases ride height and wheel travel, the opposite of what you want for road racing.

1974 Kawasaki Z1
Stock front hub and rear axle.
Last edit: 11 May 2011 19:33 by dutchz.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tachrev
  • Offline
  • User
  • Rubber Side Goes Down
More
11 May 2011 19:56 #450360 by tachrev
Replied by tachrev on topic rear shock angles
Shock angle actually REDUCES spring rate.

It makes it more progressive because if the shock is angled over more, the swingarm leverage ratio actually changes (more) though the stroke of the suspension.

It is a way to get a more progressive suspension with a link-less suspension setup.

1977 Kawasaki KZ1000 : Street/Strip
Build Thread
The following user(s) said Thank You: boyracer

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 May 2011 20:34 - 11 May 2011 20:57 #450373 by dutchz
Replied by dutchz on topic rear shock angles
Yes but only if you move the shock mounts towards the fulcrum point not away from it, otherwise the decreased leverage on the shock will negate the reduction in spring rate.

1974 Kawasaki Z1
Stock front hub and rear axle.
Last edit: 11 May 2011 20:57 by dutchz.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 May 2011 20:45 #450377 by boyracer
Replied by boyracer on topic rear shock angles
Thanks guy, I searched Tony Foale,etc with no luck. some assbandit has stolen my phil irving book.
Just as i suspected, leverage angles and looking at the old 'arm the shock was bolted in the bottom rearmost position. I dragged the bike and i think the next owner had a go too. You can see the rim locks in rear rim...this bike used to hook up good with a 170/60 in back. has a tall 160 in at present.

Attachment S5000980.JPG not found


.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • wireman
  • Offline
  • User
  • The most interesting prick in the world
More
11 May 2011 22:09 #450390 by wireman
Replied by wireman on topic rear shock angles

531blackbanshee wrote:




they use this jig to make sure they are in the right place.




beyond that i am of no help. :whistle:

leon

oh that poor z1 frame,my god im starting to sound like one of those damn model A restorers! :woohoo:

posting from deep under a non-descript barn in an undisclosed location southwest of Omaha.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 May 2011 22:52 - 11 May 2011 22:55 #450400 by mjg15
Replied by mjg15 on topic rear shock angles
This on my 550, the original location was where the "O' is drawn. The shock angle changed about 10 degrees. I hope it improves the geometry, but I admit that I did mostly for cosmetics. To my eye piggyback shocks look better at an angle greater than stock.

'80 Z750fx
'81 KZ550A
'81 GPz550's, Too many!
'82 KZ1000R
'82 GPz750
'90 ZR550


Project photo album: s163.photobucket.com/albums/t289/mg15_ph...GPz-ZR550%20project/
s163.photobucket.com/albums/t289/mg15_ph...current=DSC01286.jpg
Attachments:
Last edit: 11 May 2011 22:55 by mjg15.
The following user(s) said Thank You: wireman

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tachrev
  • Offline
  • User
  • Rubber Side Goes Down
More
11 May 2011 23:29 #450422 by tachrev
Replied by tachrev on topic rear shock angles

dutchz wrote: Yes but only if you move the shock mounts towards the fulcrum point not away from it, otherwise the decreased leverage on the shock will negate the reduction in spring rate.


It can get complicated!:laugh:

1977 Kawasaki KZ1000 : Street/Strip
Build Thread

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 May 2011 23:32 #450423 by Patton
Replied by Patton on topic rear shock angles

boyracer wrote: whats the deal with laying the shocks over?...but what is the significance of the extra included angle?....


May be demonstrated with aftermarket accessory "lowering blocks" which move the lower mount rearward about 2 inches and results in the same shocks proving a ride almost as stiff as struts.

At more severe angles, the suspension action begins trying to bend the shocks more than just compressing them.

Good Fortune! :)

1973 Z1
KZ900 LTD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum