- Posts: 157
- Thank you received: 13
Z1 dual disc conversion with KZ900 wheel
- KZ802
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
1980 KZ750 LTDx2
1978 KZ1000 LTD
1976 KZ900 A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- z1kzonly
- Offline
- User
- Sustaining Member
- Posts: 2892
- Thank you received: 542
Livin in "CheektaVegas, NY
Went thru 25 of these in 40 yrs.
I SOLD OUT! THE KAW BARN IS EMPTY.
More room for The Old Girl, Harley 75 FLH Electra Glide,
Old faithful! Points ign. Bendix Orig. carb.
Starts everytime!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- KZ802
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 157
- Thank you received: 13
1980 KZ750 LTDx2
1978 KZ1000 LTD
1976 KZ900 A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Kidkawie
- Offline
- User
- I bleed premix
- Posts: 1919
- Thank you received: 245
1975 Z1 900
1994 KX250 Supermoto
2004 KX125
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hardrockminer
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- Posts: 3043
- Thank you received: 1093
I have several restored bikes along with a 2006 Goldwing with a sidecar. My wife has a 2019 Suzuki DR 650 for on and off road.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 650ed
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 15344
- Thank you received: 2829
KZ802 wrote: Thanks for the reply z1kzonly, the threads I saw were saying the extra z1 rotor alone weighs something like 8 pounds and to use stiffer fork springs, heavier fork oil etc. etc. for all the added weight. .....
Does not compute! Think about it - no matter how much weight an extra rotor might add how much of that weight is supported by the suspension? Answer - none. If you read threads that recommended heavier springs, fork oil, etc. those threads were either referring to something other than adding a rotor or they were written by someone who does not understand motorcycle suspension. Ed
1977 KZ650-C1 Original Owner - Stock (with additional invisible FIAMM horn)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TexasKZ
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 7597
- Thank you received: 2248
suspensionspot.com/blogs/news/improve-yo...cing-unsprung-weight
1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TexasKZ
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 7597
- Thank you received: 2248
www.motorcyclenews.com/news/2001/june/th...-lightweight-wheels/
1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 650ed
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 15344
- Thank you received: 2829
TexasKZ wrote: Doesn't a heavier wheel have more inertia after hitting a bump, thus requiring more damping to control it? Also, doesn't a heavier wheel have more resistance to changing direction than a lighter wheel?
Wouldn't heavier damping simply make the rest of the bike rise more when a bump was hit? The wheel would still rise over the bump regardless of the wheel's weight. I agree that a heavier wheel would have more resistance to changing direction, but I don't see how changing the amount or viscosity of the fork oil would make any difference. Ed
1977 KZ650-C1 Original Owner - Stock (with additional invisible FIAMM horn)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rick H.
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 854
- Thank you received: 255
In any event the partial kit I received/bought had the splitter, disc, brake hose, hose bracket, brake line, caliper and caliper holder and all necessary bolts. No instructions were in the box. The person I bought it from said he had the kit for a long time and needed the master cylinder in the kit for another bike so he used it, but was never able to find another factory one to replace it. There was no part number tag on the box, but there was a spot that looked like it had a pasted on tag of some sort but was long gone. I have never found the factory part number for this alleged conversion kit, but have been told it did exist and several were installed by dealers.
The installation was pretty straightforward and bleeding the system was quite easy. In operation the dual brake system works great. My only concern is that the new rotor looks "new" while the old original rotor looks "old". At some point I will send the rotors out to be machined so they look the same. The bike handles bumps and such quite well and the front wheel seems well planted when going over them. How much additional weight is offered by a 5mm rotor as compared to a 7mm rotor is of no real concern to me as it isn't a race bike. I have had the bike well over legal speeds and it stops beautifully with no pull or irregularities. Lever effort is just what I would expect on this bike and it WILL lock up the wheel if you get too rambunctious. I have had no problem trail braking with this setup and it is what the bike should have had right from the factory. I suppose there is some slight initial extra resistance when getting the bike moving from a dead stop but it is expected with more weight on the ground. That resistance is of little consequence and once moving is history. The extra resistance when stopping to the extra weight of the dual disc setup is counteracted by the additional caliper. Is there more resistance to changing direction with the dual disc setup? Perhaps but if there is any I certainly don't notice it.
Rick H.
Rick H.
1977 Kawasaki KZ-1000A1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 650ed
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 15344
- Thank you received: 2829
1977 KZ650-C1 Original Owner - Stock (with additional invisible FIAMM horn)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- david richard
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 91
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.